`How does science differ from a court law in its interpretation of probability?
Q. `How does science differ from a court law in its interpretation of probability?
Asked by Nalene K - Sun Oct 5 23:13:47 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If I understand your question, courts have two levels of proof depending on the type of case. I take it that you consider those burdens of proof as probability that a fact occurred. In criminal cases, the level of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" is not all beyond all doubt. It only requires the the fact finder (judge or jury) has a biding conviction as to the guilt of a defendant and there are not unresolved issues that would make him or her pause in the greater transactions of life. In civil cases, the level of proof is a "preponderance of the evidence". This is 50.1% of the evidence presented leaning toward a fact occurring. I'm not sure if this is exactly what you asking, but I thought I'd try.
Answered by Tim B - Sun Oct 5 23:27:18 2008
Q. `How does science differ from a court law in its interpretation of probability?
Asked by Nalene K - Sun Oct 5 23:13:47 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If I understand your question, courts have two levels of proof depending on the type of case. I take it that you consider those burdens of proof as probability that a fact occurred. In criminal cases, the level of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" is not all beyond all doubt. It only requires the the fact finder (judge or jury) has a biding conviction as to the guilt of a defendant and there are not unresolved issues that would make him or her pause in the greater transactions of life. In civil cases, the level of proof is a "preponderance of the evidence". This is 50.1% of the evidence presented leaning toward a fact occurring. I'm not sure if this is exactly what you asking, but I thought I'd try.
Answered by Tim B - Sun Oct 5 23:27:18 2008
what does the family law court of WA classify as whitegoods?
Q. what does the family law court of western australia classify as whitegoods? we have a court order in place to allow the other party to only take personal effects and whitegoods from the house and nothing else... does anyone know what they class this as?
Asked by lesylou - Wed Sep 23 04:54:13 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. This is a well-known term. "White goods" are large domestic appliances. "Brown goods" are small domestic appliances (the iron, the toaster etc). F.M.C.G. (fast moving consumer goods) are groceries and toiletries
Answered by JZD - Thu Sep 24 11:02:15 2009
Q. what does the family law court of western australia classify as whitegoods? we have a court order in place to allow the other party to only take personal effects and whitegoods from the house and nothing else... does anyone know what they class this as?
Asked by lesylou - Wed Sep 23 04:54:13 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. This is a well-known term. "White goods" are large domestic appliances. "Brown goods" are small domestic appliances (the iron, the toaster etc). F.M.C.G. (fast moving consumer goods) are groceries and toiletries
Answered by JZD - Thu Sep 24 11:02:15 2009
Should I still go to court? law and legal question?
Q. I had a suit against me for a credit card debt. I received a letter for Motion for Nonsuit from the Plaintiff's lawyer saying they wanted to dismiss all claims. This letter was also sent to the court house by the Plaintiff's lawyer. I check the case online and it said in the judgment section "dismissed". I also checked the dockets for that day of my court which is tomorrow and I didn't see my name. Should I still go to court even though I didn't receive anything directly from the court? Thanks everyone!
Asked by the1ne - Sun May 16 22:40:17 2010 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. I had a suit against me for a credit card debt. I received a letter for Motion for Nonsuit from the Plaintiff's lawyer saying they wanted to dismiss all claims. This letter was also sent to the court house by the Plaintiff's lawyer. I check the case online and it said in the judgment section "dismissed". I also checked the dockets for that day of my court which is tomorrow and I didn't see my name. Should I still go to court even though I didn't receive anything directly from the court? Thanks everyone!
Asked by the1ne - Sun May 16 22:40:17 2010 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
What is the difference in a court of law between a "petition" and a "motion?"?
Q. What is the difference in a court of law between a "petition" and a "motion?" When would the petitioner submit a petition and when would the petitioner submit a motion? The differences? Thanks!
Asked by justdougjustdougjustdoug - Tue Oct 7 08:12:30 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. They are pretty close; you are trying to persuade the court to do something in your favor. However, generally a motion usually needs a motion hearing, with oral arguments by both sides; a petition can generally be decided by the judge without an actual hearing.
Answered by MenifeeManiac - Tue Oct 7 08:18:58 2008
Q. What is the difference in a court of law between a "petition" and a "motion?" When would the petitioner submit a petition and when would the petitioner submit a motion? The differences? Thanks!
Asked by justdougjustdougjustdoug - Tue Oct 7 08:12:30 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. They are pretty close; you are trying to persuade the court to do something in your favor. However, generally a motion usually needs a motion hearing, with oral arguments by both sides; a petition can generally be decided by the judge without an actual hearing.
Answered by MenifeeManiac - Tue Oct 7 08:18:58 2008
What is an instance in which breaking a law would be deemed necessary and/or acceptable by a court of law?
Q. My main emphasis of the exceptions is safety; as in, what are some examples of technical violations of the law for the sake of safety that a court would permit?
Asked by Ray Lewis - Thu Nov 5 01:20:22 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You can shoot someone if they are directly threatening your life. As in, pointing a gun at you. You cannot shoot them with the intent to kill however, only to injure enough the person enough to make yourself safe (they recommend shooting legs). Also, the person cannot have their back to you, they must be facing you. If they are not, then they are not seen as a direct threat. You can only shoot them if they are threatening your life or the lives of others. You cannot shoot someone over your property (i.e. a robber breaking into your house). That's the only example I can think of.
Answered by not_sure - Thu Nov 5 01:35:53 2009
Q. My main emphasis of the exceptions is safety; as in, what are some examples of technical violations of the law for the sake of safety that a court would permit?
Asked by Ray Lewis - Thu Nov 5 01:20:22 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You can shoot someone if they are directly threatening your life. As in, pointing a gun at you. You cannot shoot them with the intent to kill however, only to injure enough the person enough to make yourself safe (they recommend shooting legs). Also, the person cannot have their back to you, they must be facing you. If they are not, then they are not seen as a direct threat. You can only shoot them if they are threatening your life or the lives of others. You cannot shoot someone over your property (i.e. a robber breaking into your house). That's the only example I can think of.
Answered by not_sure - Thu Nov 5 01:35:53 2009
Are there any really good websites or web pages about the Elizabethan Court of Law?
Q. I need to know about the Elizabethan Court of Law, mainly specific laws and civil rights. Like, what rights people did or didn't have, and any law that existed, preferably along with what year it was passed and what the punishments were for breaking it. It'd be great if I could have some links to websites that would have info like that, thanks.
Asked by kfig14 - Tue Apr 7 22:22:57 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. here is a good one that breaks it all down!
Answered by Kathryn L - Tue Apr 7 22:36:03 2009
Q. I need to know about the Elizabethan Court of Law, mainly specific laws and civil rights. Like, what rights people did or didn't have, and any law that existed, preferably along with what year it was passed and what the punishments were for breaking it. It'd be great if I could have some links to websites that would have info like that, thanks.
Asked by kfig14 - Tue Apr 7 22:22:57 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. here is a good one that breaks it all down!
Answered by Kathryn L - Tue Apr 7 22:36:03 2009
What type of legal document holds up in a court of law?
Q. I live in QLD Australia and need to know if i can write up visitation rights or custody agreement and have a noterier or Justice of the Peace person sign it or witness it and have it hold up in a court of law or do i need to go through solicitors to have it stand a chance? Any information or advise would be so greatly appreciated. I am not willing to have my ex kidnap my children and not see them for months or even years.
Asked by Anna Male - Mon Jun 29 06:30:31 2009 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. I live in QLD Australia and need to know if i can write up visitation rights or custody agreement and have a noterier or Justice of the Peace person sign it or witness it and have it hold up in a court of law or do i need to go through solicitors to have it stand a chance? Any information or advise would be so greatly appreciated. I am not willing to have my ex kidnap my children and not see them for months or even years.
Asked by Anna Male - Mon Jun 29 06:30:31 2009 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
Does an atheist have to swear by the bible in a court of law?
Q. Does a Non-Christian have to swear by the Bible in a Court of Law in the United States?
Asked by Corey C - Tue Sep 9 18:38:33 2008 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The court may or may not use a bible, but the witness will always swear to tell the truth. If they don't want to "swear" they can say they affirm that they will tell the truth. It is really up to the judge in the court, most courts nowadays do not use a bible, but they do ask the witness if they will swear or affirm. The idea of the bible is really only used to scare christians, I guess there is some belief that god will strike you with lightning if you swear on a bible, then lie. Perjury, lying while under oath to tell the truth in a court of law is a crime, and that is usually enough to scare people into being honest. And if the jury thinks they are lying they can still disregard the testimony. Good Luck
Answered by Cindy B - Tue Sep 9 18:42:45 2008
Q. Does a Non-Christian have to swear by the Bible in a Court of Law in the United States?
Asked by Corey C - Tue Sep 9 18:38:33 2008 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The court may or may not use a bible, but the witness will always swear to tell the truth. If they don't want to "swear" they can say they affirm that they will tell the truth. It is really up to the judge in the court, most courts nowadays do not use a bible, but they do ask the witness if they will swear or affirm. The idea of the bible is really only used to scare christians, I guess there is some belief that god will strike you with lightning if you swear on a bible, then lie. Perjury, lying while under oath to tell the truth in a court of law is a crime, and that is usually enough to scare people into being honest. And if the jury thinks they are lying they can still disregard the testimony. Good Luck
Answered by Cindy B - Tue Sep 9 18:42:45 2008
What will happen in a court of law if you deface public property in Ohio?
Q. You're not going to believe this one!! My sister is 55 years old and she deceided to paint a big boulder in a public park because she thought it would look pretty. So she and her boyfriend deceided to spray paint it orange. Now she has to go to court. Does anyone know what could happen to her as far as penalties go?
Asked by analisha2201 - Wed Aug 22 19:04:28 2007 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If she has a lawyer, she will most likely get off. If she can prove mental illness or no prior record she will most likely get off. If she acts remorseful and pays for cleanup, they will often drop charges. It will depend on if it was a state or city park and what your local laws are. If she doesn't have a lawyer, call legal aid and ask for help. Good Luck.
Answered by ruby - Wed Aug 22 19:16:45 2007
Q. You're not going to believe this one!! My sister is 55 years old and she deceided to paint a big boulder in a public park because she thought it would look pretty. So she and her boyfriend deceided to spray paint it orange. Now she has to go to court. Does anyone know what could happen to her as far as penalties go?
Asked by analisha2201 - Wed Aug 22 19:04:28 2007 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If she has a lawyer, she will most likely get off. If she can prove mental illness or no prior record she will most likely get off. If she acts remorseful and pays for cleanup, they will often drop charges. It will depend on if it was a state or city park and what your local laws are. If she doesn't have a lawyer, call legal aid and ask for help. Good Luck.
Answered by ruby - Wed Aug 22 19:16:45 2007
Does anybody know anything about Illinois small claim court law? I have a question about a summons. read on?
Q. I had a summons which was dropped off into a mailbox of a residence I havn't lived at in two years. This wasn't in a sealed envolope, and valuable information was posted on it which the present residers of that address saw. They happened to know me and gave it to me but I didn't want them to know my business. Is it legal the way I received the summons? Is there anything that I can do about it? My court case is tommorrow and I havn't had time to prepare because I just received the summons from the current resident. Is it too late? Ten points to a speedy, accurate response.
Asked by Doug H - Tue May 8 00:49:01 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. In the event that a process server is unable to serve you personally, in most jurisdictions service at your last known address is sufficient. Having said that, if you go to court tomorrow and explain the short notice to the judge, the court will grant an adjournment to a more convenient date.
Answered by Jack - Tue May 8 00:57:37 2007
Q. I had a summons which was dropped off into a mailbox of a residence I havn't lived at in two years. This wasn't in a sealed envolope, and valuable information was posted on it which the present residers of that address saw. They happened to know me and gave it to me but I didn't want them to know my business. Is it legal the way I received the summons? Is there anything that I can do about it? My court case is tommorrow and I havn't had time to prepare because I just received the summons from the current resident. Is it too late? Ten points to a speedy, accurate response.
Asked by Doug H - Tue May 8 00:49:01 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. In the event that a process server is unable to serve you personally, in most jurisdictions service at your last known address is sufficient. Having said that, if you go to court tomorrow and explain the short notice to the judge, the court will grant an adjournment to a more convenient date.
Answered by Jack - Tue May 8 00:57:37 2007
My opponent has friends in post office. Manipulated fake under certificate of posting submited in court of law?
Q. The letters as above did not come to me at all. How I will fight in the lower court of law? Is certificate of posting can be a valid evidence in high court?
Asked by Bidhan - Sat Mar 28 13:50:57 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If you have proof, you are all set. I assume all you have is suspicion and a good dose of paranoia.
Answered by Parnassus - Sat Mar 28 13:59:30 2009
Q. The letters as above did not come to me at all. How I will fight in the lower court of law? Is certificate of posting can be a valid evidence in high court?
Asked by Bidhan - Sat Mar 28 13:50:57 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments
A. If you have proof, you are all set. I assume all you have is suspicion and a good dose of paranoia.
Answered by Parnassus - Sat Mar 28 13:59:30 2009
If I write up a contract in my own words, is it still binding in a court of law?
Q. I'm a single mother and I want to write up a contract with a few rules to protect my baby. If I do this does it need to be notarized, or will it hold up in a court of law as it is?
Asked by Wicked - Sun Jul 2 03:22:42 2006 - - 12 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Hi Wicked! I'm always amazed at the variety of answers people will give when they have no clue as to what they're talking about. So, let's see if we can give you proper advice. First. Yes, any holographic (hand written) contract can be binding, so long as it meets the basic conditions for a valid contract (isn't a contract for an illegal act, signed by two or more people with the capacity to contract, etcetera). The mere fact that it's handwritten won't hurt you. However, your handwriting can come to bite you - so I always suggest typing and spellcheck, just because words have extreme value in contracts. Second. It does NOT have to be notarized. The reason some folks might tell you that it needs to be is that it can be hard to… [cont.]
Answered by negotiator - Sun Jul 2 09:06:01 2006
Q. I'm a single mother and I want to write up a contract with a few rules to protect my baby. If I do this does it need to be notarized, or will it hold up in a court of law as it is?
Asked by Wicked - Sun Jul 2 03:22:42 2006 - - 12 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Hi Wicked! I'm always amazed at the variety of answers people will give when they have no clue as to what they're talking about. So, let's see if we can give you proper advice. First. Yes, any holographic (hand written) contract can be binding, so long as it meets the basic conditions for a valid contract (isn't a contract for an illegal act, signed by two or more people with the capacity to contract, etcetera). The mere fact that it's handwritten won't hurt you. However, your handwriting can come to bite you - so I always suggest typing and spellcheck, just because words have extreme value in contracts. Second. It does NOT have to be notarized. The reason some folks might tell you that it needs to be is that it can be hard to… [cont.]
Answered by negotiator - Sun Jul 2 09:06:01 2006
Are there any Muslim female Sharia law court judges in the UK?
Q. Or anywhere? Is this type of equality possible in Islam?
Asked by Arthur - Sun Oct 18 12:35:34 2009 - - 8 Answers - 1 Comments
A. The answer to all three of your questions is "no". I could expound for pages on this subject, but to save my fingers, I shall leave it at that simple "no, no, and no". if you want to learn more of Islam
Answered by halcon - Sun Oct 18 13:33:18 2009
Q. Or anywhere? Is this type of equality possible in Islam?
Asked by Arthur - Sun Oct 18 12:35:34 2009 - - 8 Answers - 1 Comments
A. The answer to all three of your questions is "no". I could expound for pages on this subject, but to save my fingers, I shall leave it at that simple "no, no, and no". if you want to learn more of Islam
Answered by halcon - Sun Oct 18 13:33:18 2009
What is the main reason of court law?
Q. What is the main reason of court law?
Asked by Elenor D - Sun Feb 28 18:39:57 2010 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. What is the main reason of court law?
Asked by Elenor D - Sun Feb 28 18:39:57 2010 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
Can a video film or footage considered admissable in the court of law?
Q. What for example one hubbyist of a videocam started to take video of the a passage in one downtown suburb at night in his hotel room, filming people passing by in one of the dimly lighted street then sudden he saw a woman being maul, beaten and rob by two men, but by zooming diligently with the camera he has clear picture of the two perpetrators. Now the question- Is this considered admissable in the crime of robbery if he will present this in court? Because some lawyers if he happens to defend the two guys would tell the judge that this is clearly a manifestation violation of the rights of the accuse. Is this true? Because the video tapes clearly state the two men who are his client who robbed a woman downtown are already guilty… [cont.]
Asked by nice_n_easy - Fri Sep 21 05:48:55 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The law is funny about cameras and videos. Actually, the video is not "the" evidence. Except in administrative proceedings (traffic tickets for the most part), the evidence is the testimony of an eyewitness. Q. Were you at x dimly lit street on Y date at Z o'clock. A. Yes. Q. Did you observe something happening? A. Yes, I saw D beating the bejeezus out of V. Q. Did you have a video camera with you? A. Yes, and I videotaped the beating. Other lawyer: Your honor, I request a voir dire of the tape. Judge clears the jury out of the courtroom for voir dire, shows the videotaped images to the witness. Q. Is the videotaped image a fair and accurate representation of what you saw? A. Yes. I offer the videotape in evidence. After the… [cont.]
Answered by cybersharque - Fri Sep 21 06:59:30 2007
Q. What for example one hubbyist of a videocam started to take video of the a passage in one downtown suburb at night in his hotel room, filming people passing by in one of the dimly lighted street then sudden he saw a woman being maul, beaten and rob by two men, but by zooming diligently with the camera he has clear picture of the two perpetrators. Now the question- Is this considered admissable in the crime of robbery if he will present this in court? Because some lawyers if he happens to defend the two guys would tell the judge that this is clearly a manifestation violation of the rights of the accuse. Is this true? Because the video tapes clearly state the two men who are his client who robbed a woman downtown are already guilty… [cont.]
Asked by nice_n_easy - Fri Sep 21 05:48:55 2007 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The law is funny about cameras and videos. Actually, the video is not "the" evidence. Except in administrative proceedings (traffic tickets for the most part), the evidence is the testimony of an eyewitness. Q. Were you at x dimly lit street on Y date at Z o'clock. A. Yes. Q. Did you observe something happening? A. Yes, I saw D beating the bejeezus out of V. Q. Did you have a video camera with you? A. Yes, and I videotaped the beating. Other lawyer: Your honor, I request a voir dire of the tape. Judge clears the jury out of the courtroom for voir dire, shows the videotaped images to the witness. Q. Is the videotaped image a fair and accurate representation of what you saw? A. Yes. I offer the videotape in evidence. After the… [cont.]
Answered by cybersharque - Fri Sep 21 06:59:30 2007
How can you prove a gift is a gift in a court of law, rather than a loan?
Q. I am doing a fake court thing and I am defending a person acoused of failing to make a payment on what the prosecutor is saying is a loan. It was however a gift. So what documents should I present? Where should my angle come from? they have stated they have a loan document.
Asked by Benjamin - Sun Sep 13 18:10:24 2009 - - 6 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Well, I would think the absence of documents would help prove it is a gift. Usually a loan is written out. If it was a check was anything written in the memo area? Also the fact that the person never made any effort to give money back should help. The burden is really on the plaintiff to prove they loaned the money.
Answered by Natasha B(blocked by cowards) - Sun Sep 13 18:15:45 2009
Q. I am doing a fake court thing and I am defending a person acoused of failing to make a payment on what the prosecutor is saying is a loan. It was however a gift. So what documents should I present? Where should my angle come from? they have stated they have a loan document.
Asked by Benjamin - Sun Sep 13 18:10:24 2009 - - 6 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Well, I would think the absence of documents would help prove it is a gift. Usually a loan is written out. If it was a check was anything written in the memo area? Also the fact that the person never made any effort to give money back should help. The burden is really on the plaintiff to prove they loaned the money.
Answered by Natasha B(blocked by cowards) - Sun Sep 13 18:15:45 2009
How do you prove in a court of law someone is gay?
Q. Congress passed a law including sexual orientation and gender on the hate crimes list. How do you enforce that it is a hate crime if no one can prove that a person is gay or straight beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Asked by BVEEZER - Tue May 22 14:47:27 2007 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments
A. That isn't really necessary. What you have to prove is that the perpetrator committed a crime out of prejudice against someone's sexual orientation. For example, if a man goes around boasting he "Killed me a f*g last night" that would be evidence of such a hate crime--whether his victim was gay or not. If someone with a long-standing history of hatred toward lesbians--to use another example--sets fire to a lesbian bar, then that also might be considered evidence of a "hate crime." Although, of course evidence of same-sex orientation really isn't that hard to find in some people's lives if you look hard enough and (especially) if they're not trying to hide it.
Answered by zahir13 - Tue May 22 15:01:08 2007
Q. Congress passed a law including sexual orientation and gender on the hate crimes list. How do you enforce that it is a hate crime if no one can prove that a person is gay or straight beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Asked by BVEEZER - Tue May 22 14:47:27 2007 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments
A. That isn't really necessary. What you have to prove is that the perpetrator committed a crime out of prejudice against someone's sexual orientation. For example, if a man goes around boasting he "Killed me a f*g last night" that would be evidence of such a hate crime--whether his victim was gay or not. If someone with a long-standing history of hatred toward lesbians--to use another example--sets fire to a lesbian bar, then that also might be considered evidence of a "hate crime." Although, of course evidence of same-sex orientation really isn't that hard to find in some people's lives if you look hard enough and (especially) if they're not trying to hide it.
Answered by zahir13 - Tue May 22 15:01:08 2007
what are the penalties in the state of california for violating a family law court visitation order?
Q. I have a court order for visitation of my daughter - I pay (always have) my child support with no arrearages, but the mother will NOT abide by the court order. I have not visited once in five years with my daughter, she will not let me talk to her, send me photos, school reports, etc. No opinions please. I know I need to go back to court -- I am just curious as to the penalties she faces for not abiding for the order. Thank you.
Asked by Tingers - Sat Aug 23 19:14:58 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Go back to court and tell the judge that the mother is not abiding by the court order,the judge may even give you custody of the child,if the mother continues to violate the court order.I would go back to court as soon as possible,if you want a meaningful relationship with your daughter.She needs you in her life just as much as she needs her mother,and everyday that passes,precious time is slipping away,Time that can'T be replaced.Good luck!!!
Answered by Lexi - Sat Aug 23 19:28:13 2008
Q. I have a court order for visitation of my daughter - I pay (always have) my child support with no arrearages, but the mother will NOT abide by the court order. I have not visited once in five years with my daughter, she will not let me talk to her, send me photos, school reports, etc. No opinions please. I know I need to go back to court -- I am just curious as to the penalties she faces for not abiding for the order. Thank you.
Asked by Tingers - Sat Aug 23 19:14:58 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Go back to court and tell the judge that the mother is not abiding by the court order,the judge may even give you custody of the child,if the mother continues to violate the court order.I would go back to court as soon as possible,if you want a meaningful relationship with your daughter.She needs you in her life just as much as she needs her mother,and everyday that passes,precious time is slipping away,Time that can'T be replaced.Good luck!!!
Answered by Lexi - Sat Aug 23 19:28:13 2008
What happens if you are suposed to testify against someone in a court of law and you can't remember anything?
Q. I have to testify in court tomorrow but I'm so freaked out I might forget what to say or how to fight my arguement. Tips, pointers, Advice? Lawyers, experienced people, judges!??
Asked by *butterfly kisses* - Mon Apr 23 13:47:55 2007 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Just tell the truth and everything will go fine. Don't try to rehearse or you will probably mess up. Keep your answers as brief as possible and stick to the point.
Answered by Jack - Mon Apr 23 13:55:16 2007
Q. I have to testify in court tomorrow but I'm so freaked out I might forget what to say or how to fight my arguement. Tips, pointers, Advice? Lawyers, experienced people, judges!??
Asked by *butterfly kisses* - Mon Apr 23 13:47:55 2007 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Just tell the truth and everything will go fine. Don't try to rehearse or you will probably mess up. Keep your answers as brief as possible and stick to the point.
Answered by Jack - Mon Apr 23 13:55:16 2007
Is this Attempted murder in a court of Law?
Q. If Max tries to poison his brother by putting poisonous mushrooms in his food, but this is unsuccessful as Max doesn't come home for tea, is this classed as Attempted Murder in a court of law?
Asked by Tom - Tue Jan 27 14:39:25 2009 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. If Max tries to poison his brother by putting poisonous mushrooms in his food, but this is unsuccessful as Max doesn't come home for tea, is this classed as Attempted Murder in a court of law?
Asked by Tom - Tue Jan 27 14:39:25 2009 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'court of law'
Sun Aug 1 03:43:24 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
newsweek.com
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:58:52 GMT+00:00
Newsweek ... campaign-finance legislation that would replace some of the disclosure requirements struck from the law by the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling in ... Loopholes Grow in Bill to Offset Campaign Ruling New York Times Conservatives take on the NRA over deal on disclosure bill Washington Post (blog) NRA exemption from campaign finance law 'defies logic,' group says Raw Story FrumForum - Politico - U.S. News & World Report (blog)
bensguide.gpo.gov
450px x 600px | 65.30kB
[source page]
The Supreme Court building with Authority of Law statue
architecturefarm.wordpress.com
twleslie
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:50:18 GM
His current project looks at Gunnar Asplund's Goteborg . Law Courts. Annex by Gunnar Asplund, a star-crossed project that went through numerous revisions before finally being build in 1934. Architecture students in the 1980s (and you know ...
[Hide]▲
