You cannot be serious - or are you?
Q. Sarah poses for camera after failing first driving test
Asked by Mojo workin' - Sun Oct 26 04:42:05 2008 - - 17 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Ha Ha Ha,Very funny.
Answered by pretty mommy - Sun Oct 26 04:45:31 2008

Okay Cons! This is war. Will you join?
Q. With all the bad we hear from the mainstream media about Iraq. It makes me sick to think that most people take what the AP says to heart. I've been doing other reading, and googling, and have found quite a bit about the good news from Iraq. Here's a few. if you google, good news in Iraq, you get about 46 million hits. Many of them are very enlightening. I'm copying and pasting many of these links to my friends in emails. We have got to get this kind of information out now. Before Pelosi and Reid really cause some major damage. If you want, you can copy/paste the above links into emails.
Asked by scottdman2003 - Sat May 5 08:22:12 2007 - - 11 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Oh captain, my captain! Reporting for duty, Sir! --- I've added below a link to the complete poem by Walt Whitman about the fall of Abraham Lincoln - first Republican President.
Answered by bossbackocd - Sat May 5 09:01:22 2007

creationist, what do you think of this?
Q. Ok, so you believe that evolution doesn't exist, that a different type of animal can't come from another like a human from a ape. But I have something for you. Lets look at dogs like the mastiff, saint bernard, now look at the wolf, they look nothing alike and don't act alike. But there were no mastiffs and saint Bernard's when the first humans were around, but there were wolves. Eventually humans tamed a few wolves and used them as we use dogs, but the wolves were too crazy, to wild, and not suited to what humans needed or wanted. So they used special breeding to eventually evolve the wolf into a more human friendly animal, and even a smarter animal, the dog. What I'm getting at is if we could change this: into this: than apes… [cont.]
Asked by Rasputin - Wed Feb 4 14:26:46 2009 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments

A. I think the debate centers around the difference between Macro and Micro evolution. Micro - deviation and adaptation of species - lots of evidence for the incredible flexibility of DNA, however all these deviations are part of the same species family (canine in your example) Macro - transition from one species type to a completely unique species type - ie: fish to mammal. There is no observable evidence to this or fossil record and is the big gap in the theory that causes lots of debate.
Answered by Jim S - Wed Feb 4 14:40:52 2009